Sohar Aluminium v. Nasser Trading
Sohar Aluminium is pursuing Nasser Trading over non-delivery and quality defects under a three-year alumina logistics contract. The claim seeks recovery of price differential and consequential losses. Currently in discovery before the Commercial Court in Muscat, with a document production deadline approaching and expert reports on quantum being commissioned.
Documentary record is coherent and witness evidence largely aligns, but one material contradiction and outstanding expert work reduce confidence.
- Chronology is continuous and sourced to signed contract, correspondence and meeting minutes.
- Two independent witness statements corroborate the November 2023 oral variation.
- Documentary evidence supports the price-adjustment argument (June 2023 email trail).
- No independent expert valuation submitted for the shortfall claim.
- Delivery-note authentication for the 340 MT figure not yet confirmed.
- Opposing counsel's oral-variation defence not yet rebutted with documentary evidence.
Assessment based on chronology, witness statements, and evidence on file — directional guidance for the lawyer, not a predicted outcome.
Evidence documents
17 documents indexed from the case bundle. Each row is cross-referenced to the Chronology, Witness Comparator or expert workstream that relies on it.
AI-assisted content — all outputs require lawyer review before use.